Le v. CVS Rx Services Inc
| Loc Le |
| CVS RX Services, Inc. and CVS Rx Services Inc |
| 3:2023cv00122 |
| January 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: #5 Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration is Granted. This case is hereby STAYED, and the parties shall proceed to binding arbitration within 30 days of the execution of this order. The parties are ORDERED to notify the Court upon completion of the arbitration so the case may be reinstated. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 3/14/2023) (svc)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: If Plaintiff opposes this Motion, he must file a response that complies with Local Rule 7.1(d). Therefore, the Court STRIKES #8 Plaintiff's Response. If Plaintiff wishes to file a response to Defendant's motion, he must now seek leave to do so ON OR BEFORE MARCH 3, 2023. See generally Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/24/2023) (svc)
|
|
Filing 8
***STRICKEN per #9 Order****RESPONSE filed by Loc Le re: #5 MOTION to Stay or Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration (Smith, Brett) Modified on 2/27/2023 (svc).
|
|
Filing 7
Appendix in Support filed by CVS Rx Services Inc re #6 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion (Peterson, Alyssa)
|
|
Filing 6
Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by CVS Rx Services Inc re #5 MOTION to Stay or Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration (Peterson, Alyssa)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Stay or Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration filed by CVS Rx Services Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Peterson, Alyssa)
|
|
Filing 4
New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sxf)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by CVS RX Services, Inc.. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Peterson, Alyssa)
|
|
Filing 2
Appendix in Support filed by CVS RX Services, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal. (Peterson, Alyssa) Modified text on 1/18/2023 (sxf).
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by CVS RX Services, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13446579) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Peterson, Alyssa) (Attachment 1-2 replaced to flatten pdf on 1/18/2023) (sxf).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
