Harless v. Twine LLC et al
Kevin Harless |
Twine LLC and SmartLock Self Storage LLC |
3:2023cv00196 |
January 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Brantley Starr |
Labor: Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The new deadline to answer is March 29, 2023. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 3/14/2023) (chmb) |
Filing 10 Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint filed by SmartLock Self Storage LLC, Twine LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Gould, Andrew) Modified text on 3/14/2023 (mms). |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The new deadline is March 15, 2023. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 2/28/2023) (chmb) |
Filing 8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint filed by SmartLock Self Storage LLC, Twine LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Andrew M Gould added to party SmartLock Self Storage LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew M Gould added to party Twine LLC(pty:dft) (Gould, Andrew) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Twine LLC; served on 2/8/2023, as to SmartLock Self Storage LLC; served on 2/8/2023. (Welmaker, Douglas) Modified text on 2/15/2023 (mms). |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #3 Motion (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 1/26/2023) Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed Without Local Counsel. Having considered the motion, if any, it is the opinion of this Honorable Court that said Motion should be in all things granted.Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed Without Local Counsel is hereby GRANTED. (Judge Brantley Starr) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to SmartLock Self Storage LLC, Twine LLC. (mms) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mms) |
Filing 3 MOTION To Proceed Without Local Counsel filed by Kevin Harless (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Welmaker, Douglas) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kevin Harless. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Welmaker, Douglas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Kevin Harless. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number BTXNDC-13469526) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Cover Sheet) (Welmaker, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.