Whiddon v. C-Level Trucking, LLC et al
Rodney Whiddon |
C-Level Trucking, LLC and Joseph Bennett |
3:2023cv00211 |
January 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sidney A Fitzwater |
Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 5/19/2023. Discovery due by 10/13/2023. Joinder of Parties due by 4/21/2023. Motions due by 10/13/2023. Status Report due by 10/13/2023. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 3/6/2023) (oyh) |
Filing 9 TRIAL SETTING ORDER: Trial set for 2/20/2024 before Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 3/6/2023) (oyh) |
Filing 8 Joint STATUS REPORT and Scheduling Proposal filed by Joseph Bennett, C-Level Trucking, LLC. (Cox, Clinton) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Rodney Whiddon. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Browne, Spencer) |
Filing 6 AMENDED DOCUMENT (Amended Notice of Removal) by C-Level Trucking, LLC, Joseph Bennett. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit(s) Exhibit D) (Cox, Clinton) Modified text on 2/14/2023 (sxf). |
Filing 5 Order for Scheduling Order Proposal: Proposed Scheduling Order due by 2/27/2023. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 1/30/2023) (axm) |
Filing 4 ORDER: No later than 14 days from the date of this order, defendant must file an amended notice of removal that alleges diversity of citizenship, in conformity with 28 U.S.C. 1332; otherwise, this action will be remanded to state court. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 1/30/2023) (axm) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mlb) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Joseph Bennett, C-Level Trucking, LLC. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Cox, Clinton) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by C-Level Trucking, LLC, Joseph Bennett. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13474159) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Additional Page(s) Certificate of Interested Persons, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A- Index of State Pleadings, #4 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B- Docket Sheet, #5 Exhibit(s) Exhibit C- All Pleadings, #6 Exhibit(s) Exhibit D - Copy of Suit Served, #7 Cover Sheet Supplement Supplemental Cover Sheet) (Cox, Clinton) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.