Nulo Inc v. Penefit International Trading Co Ltd
Petitioner: Nulo Inc
Respondent: Penefit International Trading Co Ltd
Case Number: 3:2023cv00287
Filed: February 9, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 9 U.S.C. ยง 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Penefit International Trading Co Ltd; served on 3/17/2023. (Delgado, Emiliano)
February 21, 2023 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Penefit International Trading Co Ltd filed by Nulo Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s) of Emiliano D. Delgado and Exhibits) (Delgado, Emiliano)
February 9, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Penefit International Trading Co Ltd. (acm)
February 9, 2023 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (acm)
February 9, 2023 Filing 2 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS (Civil Cover Sheet) to #1 Complaint by Petitioner Nulo, Inc. (Delgado, Emiliano) Modified text on 2/9/2023 (acm).
February 9, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Penefit International Trading Co., Ltd. filed by Nulo, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13505095) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Declaration(s) of Emiliano D. Delgado) (Delgado, Emiliano)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nulo Inc v. Penefit International Trading Co Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nulo Inc
Represented By: Scott Cole
Represented By: Emiliano Delgado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Penefit International Trading Co Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?