Dela Cruz v. Reid-Anderson et al
| Antonio Dela Cruz |
| James Reid-Anderson, W. Marshall Barber, Richard W Roedel, Kurt M Cellar, Nancy A Krejsa, Jon L Luther, Stephen D Owens, David McKillips, Mark Kane, Stephen R Purtell and Six Flags Entertainment Corp |
| 3:2023cv00396 |
| February 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchange |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Rusty E. Glenn. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 3/2/2023) (Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Antonio Dela Cruz. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Federman, William) |
| Filing 6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Rusty E. Glenn (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-13556533) filed by Antonio Dela Cruz (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Federman, William) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: On 2/21/2023 plaintiff filed a complaint in this case but did not provide the clerk with a certificate of interested persons. Accordingly, no later than 14 days after this order is filed, plaintiff must comply with Rule 3.1(c)or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 2/23/2023) (oyh)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File. Accordingly, the complaint [ECF No. 2, pp. 1-118] and Exhibit 2 to the complaint [ECF No. 2, pp. 143-159] shall be filed and maintained under seal. The clerk of court is directed to unseal this case except as to the documents that are sealed under this order. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 2/22/2023) (axm)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File Complaint and Exhibit Under Seal filed by Antonio Dela Cruz. (axm) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against W. Marshall Barber, Kurt M. Cellar, Mark Kane, Nancy A. Krejsa, Jon L. Luther, David McKillips, Stephen D. Owens, Stephen R Purtell, James Reid-Anderson, Richard W. Roedel, Six Flags Entertainment Corp filed by Antonio Dela Cruz. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 300003990) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (axm) (Main Document 2 replaced on 2/23/2023) (axm). (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/23/2023: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Sealed Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Cover Sheet) (axm). Modified security per #4 Order on 2/23/2023 (axm). |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
