Jones v. Tate Rehmet Law Office et al
Plaintiff: Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant: Tate Rehmet Law Office and J Bart Smith
Case Number: 3:2023cv00462
Filed: March 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David L Horan
Referring Judge: Karen Gren Scholer
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2023 Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Tate Rehmet Law Office, Law Office of Chad Kimble, Guillermo Santoyo Jr, Joel Gonzalez, All State Company, Progressive Insurance, on 4/25/2023. (agc)
April 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER DENYING #11 MOTION FOR EXTENSION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 4/18/2023) (mcrd)
April 13, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time Past May 30,2023 filed by Michael Darnell Jones. (agc)
April 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER WITHDRAWING #9 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION, TERMINATING MOTION AS MOOT, AND REGARDING SERVICE. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 4/5/2023) (mcrd)
March 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ***WITHDRAWN PER #10 ORDER*** FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should deny Plaintiff Michael Darnell Jones leave to proceed in forma pauperis, see Dkt. No. #7 , and order that he pay the $402 filing fee within 21 days of any order accepting or adopting this recommendation (or within some other reasonable time to be set by the Court), and, if he fails to do so, the Court should dismiss this action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) without further notice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 3/23/2023) (mcrd) Modified on 4/5/2023 (mcrd).
March 21, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time filed by Michael Darnell Jones. (acm)
March 21, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Darnell Jones. (acm)
March 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER REGARDING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: Michael Darnell Jones must address the following deficiency: Jones has neither paid the filing fee nor moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) as to this new lawsuit. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 4/3/2023. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 3/3/2023) (sxf)
March 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER REQUIRING AMENDED COMPLAINT: Michael Darnell Jones must address the following deficiency: The complaint as filed lacks factual content to show that any of the violations alleged are plausible (not just speculative or even conceivable). Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 4/3/2023. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 3/3/2023) (sxf)
March 1, 2023 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against J Bart Smith, Tate Rehmet Law Office filed by Michael Darnell Jones. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Originally field in case 3:22-cv-1905 as document number 22) (oyh)
March 1, 2023 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (oyh)
March 1, 2023 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh)
February 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Clerk of the Court is directed to strike from the docket Plaintiff's Motion to Refile in Another Court as this action is no longer pending and file the Motion in a new randomly assigned civil action against the same Defendants as in this case. (Originally field in case 3:22-cv-1905 as document 23) (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 3/1/2023) (oyh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Tate Rehmet Law Office et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Darnell Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tate Rehmet Law Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J Bart Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?