Nolasco v. National Vision Inc
Rosario Nolasco |
National Vision Inc doing business as America's Best Contacts & Eyeglasses |
3:2023cv00519 |
March 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
A Joe Fish |
Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
Torts/Pers Prop: Other Personal Property Damage |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 12 Amended JOINT STATUS REPORT filed by Rosario Nolasco. (Verich, Rachel) |
|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of Rule 26 Disclosures filed by National Vision Inc (Lee, Vionette) |
Filing 9 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Rosario Nolasco. (Verich, Rachel) |
|
Filing 7 AMENDED DOCUMENT (Amended Notice of Removal) by National Vision Inc. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Amended Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) State Court Index and Copy of File) (Lee, Vionette) Modified text on 3/13/2023 (sxf). |
|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Rosario Nolasco. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Verich, Rachel) |
|
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (acm) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by NATIONAL VISION INC. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Lee, Vionette) (Main Document 2 replaced to flatten PDF on 3/8/2023) (acm). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by NATIONAL VISION INC. (Filing fee $402; receipt number BTXNDC-13574153) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Lee, Vionette) (Main Document 1 replaced to flatten PDF on 3/8/2023) (acm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nolasco v. National Vision Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rosario Nolasco | |
Represented By: | Rachel Michelle Verich |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: National Vision Inc doing business as America's Best Contacts & Eyeglasses | |
Represented By: | Vionette Delgado Lee |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.