Clarence v. Villalobos
Petitioner: Adams Edward Clarence
Respondent: Moises Villalobos and Director, TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 3:2023cv00766
Filed: April 11, 2023
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Referring Judge: Renee Harris Toliver
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marta R McLaughlin on behalf of Director, TDCJ-CID. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (McLaughlin, Marta)
May 16, 2023 Filing 9 Clerk's Notice of Electronic Service to the Office of Attorney General of Texas. (ykp)
May 16, 2023 Acknowledgment of Electronic Service from the Office of Attorney General of Texas re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 Consent Form, #8 Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer, #4 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion. (ykp)
May 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, Notice, and Instructions to Parties. The clerk will electronically serve this order, the petition, and supporting documents to the designee for the Office of the Texas Attorney General. Show Cause Response due by 7/18/2023. Deadline to reply to the response is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 5/16/2023) (chmb)
May 16, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Tue May 16 16:43:48 CDT 2023 (crt)
May 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #6 Petitioner's first Motion for Extension of Time to comply with the Court's deficiency order. Petitioner is GRANTED until June 15, 2023, to comply with the Court's deficiency order (Doc. 5). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 5/10/2023) (chmb)
May 10, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Wed May 10 11:46:34 CDT 2023 (crt)
May 9, 2023 Filing 6 Motion for Extension of time to Comply with 5 Order And Notice of Deficiency filed by Adams Edward Clarence. (agc) Modified event on 5/10/2023 (rekc).
April 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Petitioner Adams Edward Clarence must address the following deficiency: Petitioner did not pay the required filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1914 (requiring $5.00 filing fee for writs of habeas corpus); N.D. TEX. MISC. ORD. 14 (requiring inmates to file motions to proceed in forma pauperis on the court-approved form). Therefore, Petitioner is ORDERED to pay the $5.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis with the required certificate of inmate trust account by May 11, 2023. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b). The form necessary to comply with this order is available in the law library of the prison unit in which Petitioner is confined. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 4/12/2023) (chmb)
April 12, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Apr 12 14:54:04 CDT 2023 (crt)
April 11, 2023 Filing 4 Memorandum in Support filed by Adams Edward Clarence re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (acm)
April 11, 2023 Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Adams Edward Clarence. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (acm)
April 11, 2023 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (acm)
April 11, 2023 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (acm)
April 11, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Tue Apr 11 16:30:03 CDT 2023 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clarence v. Villalobos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Adams Edward Clarence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Moises Villalobos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Represented By: Marta R McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?