Fenimore v. Hill et al
| Rodney P Fenimore |
| Wendy Hill and City of Mesquite |
| 3:2023cv01076 |
| May 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| David L Horan |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by City of Mesquite with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Tooley, Joe) |
| Filing 7 First MOTION to Quash Service filed by City of Mesquite with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Ex.A Williamson affidavit, #2 Exhibit(s) Ex. B Thompson affidavit, #3 Additional Page(s) attachment to Ex. B)Attorney Joe C Tooley added to party City of Mesquite(pty:dft) (Tooley, Joe) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Jun 6 09:23:22 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 6 SPECIAL ORDER 3-348 REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Ed Kinkeade for all further proceedings. Senior Judge Sam R Cummings no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 6/2/2023) (chmb) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. remailed per request Fri Jun 2 11:48:41 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING SERVICE: Because Fenimore paid the filing fee, he must properly serve each defendant with a summons and the complaint in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 or obtain a waiver of service from that defendant. The Court further advises Fenimore that, if proper service is not made and shown to the Court through a filed proof of service before the 90th day after the filing of this action (on May 11, 2023) that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday - which will be August 9, 2023 - this case is subject to dismissal without prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 5/12/2023) (mcrd)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 5. Fri May 12 16:24:37 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Rodney P Fenimore. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (acm) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against City of Mesquite, Wendy Hill filed by Rodney P Fenimore. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 300005478) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (acm) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (acm) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (acm) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Thu May 11 16:07:37 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
