United States of America v. $39,900 in US Currency
| United States and United States of America |
| $39,900 in US Currency |
| Kentrell Vashaun Harris |
| 3:2023cv01168 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Forfeiture/Penalty: Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 881 |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property - Aircraft |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
RESPONSE/ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by Kentrell Vashaun Harris. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (agc)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Suppress Evidence filed by Kentrell Vashaun Harris. (agc)
|
|
Filing 8
***Disregard, The information attached to Entry 8 was previously entered. *** Docket text modified on 6/27/2023 (twd)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are directed to confer within 14 days of the date of this Order regarding the following matters, and report to the Court within 14 days after the conference the parties' position. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 6/27/2023) (twd)
|
|
Filing 6
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by $39,900 in US Currency. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Michael J Todd added to party $39,900 in US Currency(pty:dft) (Todd, Michael)
|
|
Filing 4
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (agc)
|
|
Filing 3
Request for Clerk to issue Warrant for Arrest in Rem filed by United States. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Warrant for Arrest in Rem) (Lyons-DOJ, Elyse)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by United States. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Lyons-DOJ, Elyse)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against $39,900 filed by United States. (Filer fee note- Filed by the USA) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Lyons-DOJ, Elyse)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
