Carmel Capital LLC v. Austin Commercial
| Carmel Capital LLC |
| Austin Commercial and Austin Industries Inc |
| 3:2023cv01240 |
| May 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Property Rights: Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Austin Commercial. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Harwell, Gregory) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,,,, filed by Austin Commercial. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Gregory A Harwell added to party Austin Commercial(pty:dft) (Harwell, Gregory) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #5 Motion to Proceed Wihout Local Counsel. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 6/2/2023) (chmb) |
| Filing 7 Report to Copyright Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 121 e-mailed to 508filings@loc.gov. (cfk) |
| Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cfk) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Continue Proceed Without Local Counsel filed by Carmel Capital LLC (LeJune, Dana) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Withhold Summons filed by Carmel Capital LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Notice of Lawsuit and Request Waiver, #2 Exhibit(s) Proposed Waiver of Service) (LeJune, Dana) Modified on 6/1/2023 (cfk). |
| Filing 3 ***PLEASE DISREGARD ENTRY; ATTORNEY TO REFILE*** NOTICE of Request to Withhold Summons re: #1 Complaint, filed by Carmel Capital LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Notice to Defendants, #2 Exhibit(s) Proposed Waiver of Service) (LeJune, Dana) Modified docket text on 5/31/2023 (oyh). |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Carmel Capital LLC. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (LeJune, Dana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Carmel Capital LLC. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13778557) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover, #2 Exhibit(s) Copyright Registration, #3 Exhibit(s) The Works, #4 Exhibit(s) License Agreement, #5 Exhibit(s) Assignment) (LeJune, Dana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
