Haness v. Geotel Investments LLC et al
Plaintiff: Richard Haness
Defendant: Geotel Investments, LLC, Wei Zhang and Geotel Investments LLC
Case Number: 3:2023cv01311
Filed: June 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2023 Interdistrict Transfer to Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. If receiving court cannot upload, they should request restricted documents from this court and obtain public documents from PACER. Counsel advised to file future documents in Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division. (rekc)
August 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order Transferring to Another District: Case transferred to Sherman Division Division of Eastern District of Texas. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/9/2023) (chmb)
July 6, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division filed by Geotel Investments LLC with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Holmes, Robert)
June 14, 2023 Filing 10 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #2 Notice of Removal, by Defendants Geotel Investments LLC, Wei Zhang. (agc)
June 13, 2023 Filing 9 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (acm)
June 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Defendants Geotel Investments, LLC and Wei Zang (together, "Defendants") removed this case to federal court under 28 U.S.C. 1334 and 1452. Doc. No. 1 at 1 (also citing Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9027). On the Court's cursory review of the over 200 pages of removal documents, it appears Defendants did not include the suggestion of bankruptcy on which they rely for removing this case. Thus, the Court ORDERS Defendants to supplement their Notice of Removal with the suggestion of bankruptcy by 5:00 p.m., June 14, 2023. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 6/13/2023) (chmb)
June 12, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Notice of Removal. (Holmes, Robert) Modified event text on 6/13/2023 (acm).
June 12, 2023 Filing 6 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #2 Notice of Removal. Exhibit A . (Holmes, Robert) Modified event text on 6/13/2023 (acm).
June 12, 2023 Filing 5 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #2 Notice of Removal. Plaintiff's Original Petition . (Holmes, Robert) Modified event text on 6/13/2023 (acm).
June 12, 2023 Filing 4 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #2 Notice of Removal. State Court Documents . (Holmes, Robert) Modified event text on 6/13/2023 (acm).
June 12, 2023 Filing 3 *** Disregard, Duplicate Entry *** ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #2 Notice of Removal. (Main Document 3 replaced to flatten PDF on 6/13/2023) (acm). Modified event text on 6/13/2023 (acm).
June 12, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Wei Zhang, Geotel Investments, LLC. (Filer fee note- Clerk to add prior fee payment info here.) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Holmes, Robert)
June 12, 2023 Filing 1 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #2 Notice of Removal . (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Holmes, Robert) (Main Document 1, Attachment 1 replaced to flatten PDFs on 6/13/2023) (acm). Modified event text on 6/13/2023 (acm).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haness v. Geotel Investments LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Haness
Represented By: David Welch
Represented By: Jeremy Beau Powell
Represented By: Evan L Van Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Geotel Investments, LLC
Represented By: Robert Houston Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wei Zhang
Represented By: Robert Houston Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Geotel Investments LLC
Represented By: Robert Houston Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?