Castillanes v. Perez
| Amanda G Castillanes |
| Aurelio Perez |
| 3:2023cv01394 |
| June 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| David L Horan |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Assault, Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
JUDGMENT: ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that thisaction is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/31/2023) (svc)
|
|
Filing 8
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: #7 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: #3 Complaint,, filed by Amanda G Castillanes. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/31/2023) (svc)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8,9. Mon Jul 31 12:26:28 CDT 2023 (crt)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 7. Thu Jul 13 11:24:07 CDT 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 7
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 7/12/2023) (mcrd)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri Jun 23 12:34:46 CDT 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 6
ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #3 Complaint by Plaintiff Amanda G Castillanes. (mms)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Hearing filed by Amanda G Castillanes. (mms)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Amanda G Castillanes. (mms)
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT against Aurelio Perez filed by Amanda G Castillanes. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mms)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mms)
|
|
Filing 1
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mms)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Castillanes v. Perez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amanda G Castillanes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aurelio Perez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
