Nieves v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
| Jorge H. Nieves |
| Uber Technologies Inc, Roger Clifford, Brittany S Clifford and Adrien Javon Grant |
| 3:2023cv01468 |
| July 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jorge H. Nieves. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Galliani, Carlos) (Main Document 15 replaced to flatten pdf on 8/22/2023) (sxf). |
Filing 14
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 11/4/2024 before Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 8/21/2023) (frw)
|
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 11/1/2023. Discovery due by 6/3/2024. Joinder of Parties due by 11/1/2023. Motions due by 6/10/2024. Status Report due by 6/3/2024. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 8/21/2023) (frw)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER: No later than 14 days after this order is filed, plaintiff must comply with Rule 81.2, or must adopt another partys previously-filed certificate, so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 8/21/2023) (frw)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Within 14 days of the date of this order, Counsel shall either (1) provide to the court, and to the clerk of court, satisfactory documentation of membership* or (2) apply for membership in the Bar of this court or for admission pro hac vice for this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 8/21/2023) (frw)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Jorge H. Nieves. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Galliani, Carlos) |
| Filing 9 Proposal for contents of scheduling and discovery order JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT AND PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN by Uber Technologies Inc. (Ford, Robert) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Brittany S Clifford, Roger Clifford. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney David G Allen added to party Brittany S Clifford(pty:dft), Attorney David G Allen added to party Roger Clifford(pty:dft) (Allen, David) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Uber Technologies Inc. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal. . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Exhibit(s) G, #8 Exhibit(s) H, #9 Exhibit(s) I, #10 Exhibit(s) J, #11 Exhibit(s) K, #12 Exhibit(s) L, #13 Exhibit(s) M, #14 Exhibit(s) N) (Ford, Robert) Modified text on 8/2/2023 (axm). |
|
Filing 6
Order for Scheduling Order Proposal: Proposed Scheduling Order due by 8/14/2023. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 7/17/2023) (axm)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: No later than 14 days from the date of this order, defendant must file an amended notice of removal that properly alleges diversity of citizenship, in conformity with 28 U.S.C. 1332; otherwise, this action will be remanded to state court. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 7/17/2023) (axm)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Uber Technologies Inc. Amendment to #2 Cert. Of Interested Persons/Disclosure Statement. . (Ford, Robert) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Ford, Robert) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13856474) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Index, #2 Exhibit(s) A, #3 Exhibit(s) B, #4 Exhibit(s) C, #5 Exhibit(s) D, #6 Exhibit(s) E, #7 Exhibit(s) F, #8 Exhibit(s) G, #9 Exhibit(s) H, #10 Cover Sheet, #11 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Ford, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
