Mathew v. Santander Consumer USA Inc
Reena Sara Mathew and Reena S Mathew |
Santander Consumer USA Inc |
3:2023cv01494 |
July 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
David C Godbey |
Civil Rights: Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 PROTECTIVE ORDER (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 8/14/2023) (svc) |
Filing 10 INITIAL DISCOVERY ORDER FOR EMPLOYMENT CASES: Parties and counsel in this case are ordered to comply with the Initial Discovery Protocols. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 8/14/2023) (svc) |
Filing 9 ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are directed to confer within 14 days of the date of this Order regarding the following matters, and report to the Court within 14 days after the conference the parties' position. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 8/14/2023) (twd) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Santander Consumer USA Inc. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Hurst, Monte) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,,,, filed by Santander Consumer USA Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Hurst, Monte) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Respnose. Defendants response to the complaint is due August 11, 2023. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 7/31/2023) (chmb) |
Filing 5 Unopposed STIPULATION For Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Santander Consumer USA Inc. (Hurst, Monte) Modified to change event to a motion on 7/28/2023 (chmb). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Santander Consumer USA Inc. (oyh) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Reena Sara Mathew. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Uloth, Donald) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Santander Consumer USA Inc filed by Reena Sara Mathew. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13862874) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Cover Sheet) (Uloth, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.