Moses v. USA
| Norman Terry Moses |
| USA |
| 3:2023cv01645 |
| July 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Brantley Starr |
| Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Amy J Mitchell-DOJ added as AUSA. (Mitchell-DOJ, Amy)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Fri Sep 1 09:29:10 CDT 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 8
Order to Show Cause, Notice, and Instructions to Parties. The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the motion and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Brian W McKay-DOJ for USA added. Deadline to reply to the answer is 60 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/31/2023) (sxf)
|
|
Filing 7
Brief/Memorandum in Support re #6 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 filed by Norman Terry Moses. (kaf)
|
|
Filing 6
AMENDED MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 3:21-CR-00082) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kaf)
|
|
Filing 5
Electronic Standing Order - If they have not already done so, all attorneys appearing in this case must file a Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements on the docket attesting that they have read, and will comply with, the judge-specific requirements for this Court, including the Court's order concerning generative artificial intelligence. The judge-specific requirements and a template Certificate may be found at: # Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. To file the Certificate, please use the event entitled Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. This event is located in the Other Documents selection, which is under the Other Filings category of the Civil page in ECF. Please contact the ECF help desk at 214-753-2633 for filing assistance. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 8/7/2023) (axm)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. NEF of Document #5 Mon Aug 7 08:44:03 CDT 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Movant shall file either an amended 2255 motion raising all of his grounds or a notice that he intends to dismiss this case. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this new 2255 action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). No further process shall issue except upon further order of the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/26/2023) (Attachments: #1 Amended 2255 Motion) (twd)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Wed Jul 26 16:37:37 CDT 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party . (axm)
|
|
Filing 1
ORDER: The motion to appoint counsel is CONSTRUED as an initial motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255, which the Clerk of the Court is directed to file in a separate action (NOS code 510, directly assigned to the same district judge and magistrate judge as in the criminal case). (Originally filed in case 3:21-CR-82-X as document #50) (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 7/25/2023) (axm)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,3. Tue Jul 25 17:20:23 CDT 2023 (crt)
|
|
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (axm)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 3:21-CR-0082-X) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Originally filed in case 3:21-CR-082-X as document #48) (axm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moses v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Norman Terry Moses | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Amy J Mitchell-DOJ |
| Represented By: | Brian W McKay-DOJ |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
