11111 North 7th Street Property DE LLC v. Snapcommerce Holdings Inc
| 11111 North 7th Street Property DE LLC |
| Snapcommerce Holdings Inc doing business as Super and Super.com |
| 3:2023cv01686 |
| July 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| Torts/Pers Prop: Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #9 Agreed Motion to Extend Time to File Response/Reply. Before the Court is the Agreed Motion for Extension of Time filed by 11111 North 7th Street Property DE, LLC, Plaintiff, and Snapcommerce Holding, Inc. d/b/a Super.com. After consideration of the Motion and noting the agreement of both parties, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be granted. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 11111 Street's deadline to respond to Super.coms Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(2) and Incorporated Memorandum of Law is hereby extended until October 8, 2023. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 9/6/2023) (chmb)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by 11111 North 7th Street Property DE LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order on Agreed Motion to Extend Time) (Roberts, Mark) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Snapcommerce Holdings Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ross, Ian) |
|
Filing 7
Order Unfiling #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Snapcommerce Holdings Inc due to the following deficiency: The Motion does not comply with the Courts Policies and Procedures. Defendant may refile a compliant motion within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 8/15/2023) (oyh)
|
| Filing 6 ***UNFILED BY #7 ORDER*** MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Snapcommerce Holdings Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ross, Ian) Modified docket text on 8/15/2023 (oyh). |
| Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cfk) |
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Ian M. Ross. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 7/28/2023) (chmb)
|
| Filing 3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Ian M. Ross (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-13918922) filed by Snapcommerce Holdings, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Shaverdian, Phillip) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Snapcommerce Holdings, Inc.. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Shaverdian, Phillip) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Snapcommerce Holdings, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13918580) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Index of Exhibits, #4 Exhibit(s) 1, #5 Exhibit(s) 2, #6 Exhibit(s) 3, #7 Exhibit(s) 4, #8 Exhibit(s) 5, #9 Exhibit(s) 6, #10 Exhibit(s) 7, #11 Exhibit(s) 8, #12 Exhibit(s) 9, #13 Exhibit(s) 10, #14 Exhibit(s) 11) (Shaverdian, Phillip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: 11111 North 7th Street Property DE LLC v. Snapcommerce Holdings Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: 11111 North 7th Street Property DE LLC | |
| Represented By: | David E Castaneda |
| Represented By: | Mark C Roberts, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Snapcommerce Holdings Inc doing business as Super and Super.com | |
| Represented By: | Phillip Shaverdian |
| Represented By: | Ian M Ross |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
