Young v. Teamsters 767
Mikel Young |
Teamsters 767 |
3:2023cv01720 |
August 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
David C Godbey |
David L Horan |
Labor: Other Labor Litigation |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 9/18/2023) (twd) |
Filing 9 ORDER ACCEPTING #8 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 9/18/2023) (twd) |
Filing 8 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should dismiss this action with prejudice unless, within the time to file objections, Plaintiff Mikel Young satisfactorily shows a basis to amend the complaint to allege a plausible claim. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 8/14/2023) (mcrd) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 8/14/2023) (mcrd) |
Filing 6 Magistrate Judge David L. Horan assigned to this case pursuant to Special Order 3-346 for matters that may be referred. (rekc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Thu Aug 3 12:27:54 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mikel Young. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (cfk) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mikel Young. (cfk) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Teamsters 767 filed by Mikel Young. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (cfk) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (cfk) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cfk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Young v. Teamsters 767 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mikel Young | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Teamsters 767 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.