McLean v. Rivers
| Lenroy McLean |
| C Rivers |
| 3:2023cv01750 |
| August 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Before the Court is Petitioner's Reply, Doc. #10 . The Government is ORDERED to file a sur-reply by October 19, 2023 addressing the arguments raised in the Petitioner's reply, specifically the contention that Petitioner's claims are not moot and that he is entitled to immediate release to prerelease custody. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 9/28/2023) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Thu Sep 28 16:10:02 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 11 MOTION: Under Federal Rule 11 filed by Lenroy McLean. (kaf) |
| Filing 10 REPLY filed by Lenroy McLean re: #8 Response/Objection. (kaf) |
| Filing 9 Appendix in Support filed by C Rivers re #8 Response/Objection (Cruce-Haag-DOJ, Ann) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by C Rivers re: #6 Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer, (Cruce-Haag-DOJ, Ann) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by C Rivers. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Cruce-Haag-DOJ, Ann) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon Aug 14 13:38:44 CDT 2023 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, Notice, and Instructions to Parties. The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the petition and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Show Cause Response due by September 12, 2023. Petitioner may file a reply in 30 days. Ann Cruce-Haag added for Respondent. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 8/11/2023) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER. Judicial screening of this case is pending. See Rule 1(b) and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 habeas cases. The Court will order Respondent to file an answer, if necessary, after screening is complete. It is therefore ORDERED that (1) no motions for appointment of counsel shall be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (2) all discovery in this case is stayed until Respondent is ordered to file an answer or until further order of the court, (3) no amendments or supplements to the habeas corpus petition shall be filed without prior Court approval, and (4) any motion to amend the habeas petition must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended petition on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Petitioner must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address by filing a written Notice of Change of Address with the Clerk of the Court. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute or follow court order under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 8/11/2023) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Fri Aug 11 08:32:10 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Court Request for Recusal: Magistrate Judge David L. Horan recused pursuant to Special Order 3-346. Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver assigned for matters that may be referred in this case. (ndt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Mon Aug 7 14:28:07 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Lenroy McLean. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (cfk) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (cfk) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cfk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McLean v. Rivers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Lenroy McLean | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: C Rivers | |
| Represented By: | Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
