Watson et al v. Citigroup Inc
Ward Watson and Karen Watson |
Citigroup Inc |
3:2023cv01801 |
August 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Ed Kinkeade |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ELECTRONIC Order Administratively Closing Case. The Court administratively closes this case pending completion of arbitration. See Doc. No. 12. There appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as open for statistical purposes. The Clerk is, therefore, instructed to submit a JS-6 form to the Administrative Office, thereby removing this case from the statistical records.Nothing in this Order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this case, and should further proceedings become necessary or desirable, any party or the Court may initiate such further proceedings in the same manner as if this Order had not been entered. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/31/2023) (chmb) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Before the Court is the parties' Joint Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration (Doc. No. 11). The Court GRANTS the Joint Motion and hereby STAYS the case pending further order of the Court. The parties are ORDERED to file a joint status report with the Court as to the progress of the arbitration proceeding EVERY 6 months or within 30 days of the finality of the arbitration, whichever is earlier. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/31/2023) (chmb) |
Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Stay Pending Arbitration filed by Citigroup Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Morris, Brian) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Karen Watson, Ward Watson. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Currie, D) |
Filing 9 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Citigroup Inc. Amendment to #3 Cert. Of Interested Persons/Disclosure Statement. . (Perkins, LaCrecia) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Defendant removed this case to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. See Doc. No. 1 at 2. In cases where subject matter jurisdiction is based on diversity under 28 U.S. C. 1332(a), Rule 7.1(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that each party's disclosure statement "must name--and identify the citizenship of--every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party[.]" Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2) (effective December 1, 2022). Both Defendant and Plaintiffs timely filed their respective Certificates of Interested Persons, see Doc. Nos. 3 & 7, but neither contains the citizenship disclosure statement required by Rule 7.1(a)(2). Accordingly, Plaintiffs and Defendant shall file amended certificates of interested persons by August 28, 2023. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/21/2023) (chmb) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Karen Watson, Ward Watson. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Currie, D) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Based on the removal record before the Court, there appears to be no connection to the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division other than this suit having been originally filed in state court in Dallas County, Texas.Accordingly, the Court will evaluate whether a transfer of this case to the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division is warranted under 1404(a). See 28 U.S.C. 124(a)(2). Before transferring the case sua sponte, the Court will allow the parties an opportunity to be heard on this matter. The parties may each file a brief addressing the transfer of this case to the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division under 1404(a). The parties' respective briefs must be filed by September 5, 2023, and shall not exceed 15 pages in length (excluding any table of contents and table of authorities). There shall be no responsive briefs unless otherwise ordered by the Court. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/14/2023) (chmb) |
Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/14/2023) (chmb) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (agc) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Citigroup Inc.. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Morris, Brian) |
Filing 2 Appendix in Support filed by Citigroup Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal,,,, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Morris, Brian) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Citigroup Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13950939) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Morris, Brian) (Attachment 1 replaced to flatten PDF on 8/14/2023) (agc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.