Independent Bank v. Luxury Moves LLC et al
| Independent Bank, a Texas State Banking Association d/b/a Independent Financial and Independent Bank a Texas State Banking Association doing business as Independent Financial |
| Luxury Moves, LLC, Bank of America, N.A., Luxury Moves LLC and Bank of America NA |
| 3:2023cv01822 |
| August 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Contract: Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: As Bank of America has not timely complied with the Court's orders and cured the deficiencies in its jurisdictional allegations, the Court REMANDS this case to the 193rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 9/27/2023) (Attachments: #1 Remand Letter) (oyh)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC ORDER: On August 23, 2023, the Court ordered Defendant Bank of America, N.A. ("Bank of America") to file (1) an amended Notice of Removal distinctly alleging the basis for the Court's diversity jurisdiction over this case and (2) a certificate of interested persons no later than August 30, 2023. Doc. No. 3. Bank of America has not timely made either of the required filings. The Court ORDERS Bank of America to make both required filings no later than September 25, 2023. The Court WILL REMAND this case without further notice if Bank of America fails to comply with this Order. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 9/20/2023) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s Notice of Removal, which invokes this Court's diversity jurisdiction. Doc. No. 1. Because Bank of America, N.A. ("Removing Defendant") has not distinctly alleged the basis for diversity jurisdiction and has failed to file a certificate of interested persons (disclosure statement), the Court ORDERS Defendant to amend its Notice of Removal and file a certificate of interested persons no later than August 30, 2023. Failure to properly comply with this Order WILL RESULT in the remand of this case without further notice.28 U.S.C. 1447(c). (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/23/2023) (chmb)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (agc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Bank of America, N.A.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13958013) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit(s)) (Figari, Grant) (Attachment 1 replaced to flatten PDF on 8/16/2023) (agc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
