Gayton v. Rivers
Timothy Gayton |
C Rivers |
3:2023cv01842 |
August 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
Brantley Starr |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 OBJECTION filed by Timothy Gayton re: #5 Findings and Recommendations. (kaf) |
Filing 6 Status Request by Timothy Gayton with Deputy Clerk Response. (agc) |
Filing 5 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations: Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the #3 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241, received on 8/14/2023, should be DISMISSED for failure to exhaust available remedies. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/24/2023) (mcrd) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Thu Aug 24 10:47:14 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Timothy Gayton must address the following deficiency: He must either pay the $5 filing fee for a habeas case under 2241 or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis with the required certificate of inmate trust account. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/18/2023) (Attachments: #1 IFP) (sxf) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Fri Aug 18 10:20:50 CDT 2023 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Thu Aug 17 12:11:03 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Timothy Gayton. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (agc) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (agc) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (agc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gayton v. Rivers | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Timothy Gayton | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: C Rivers | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.