Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. R & G Clark Inc et al
Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
R & G Clark, Inc., R & GC Restoration, LP d/b/a Servpro of Southeast Dallas County, R & G Clark Incorporated d/b/a Servpro of Northwest Dallas, Richard Rivas, Delpha Johnson, R & G Clark Inc, R & GC Restoration LP doing business as Servpro of Southeast Dallas County and R & G Clark Incorporated doing business as Servpro of Northwest Dallas |
3:2023cv01901 |
August 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
A Joe Fish |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by R & G Clark Inc. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Lynn, Albert) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by R & G Clark Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Lynn, Albert) Modified text on 10/20/2023 (sxf). |
Filing 14 ELECTRONIC ORDER: On September 26, 2023, the court ordered the plaintiff to move for entry of default and a default judgment as to the defendant Richard Rivas ("Rivas") no later than October 10, 2023, see Electronic Order (docket entry 13), but it has failed to do so. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claims against Rivas are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Rule 16(f)(1)(c). (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/11/2023) (chmb) |
Filing 13 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Although the defendant Richard Rivas ("Rivas") is in default, the plaintiff has failed to move for entry of default and a default judgment. Unless the plaintiff moves for such relief by October 10, 2023, its claims against Rivas will be dismissed without further notice. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 9/26/2023) (chmb) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Before the court is the agreed motion to extend time for filing answer (docket entry 11) filed by the plaintiff and the defendants R & G Clark, Inc., R & GC Restoration, LP d/b/a Servpro of Southeast Dallas County, and R & G Clark Incorporated d/b/a Servpro of Northwest Dallas ("the Clark defendants"). The motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Clark defendants shall answer or otherwise respond no later than October 29, 2023. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 9/26/2023) (chmb) |
Filing 11 Agreed MOTION to Extend Time filed by R & G Clark Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Agreed Order)Attorney Albert James Lynn added to party R & G Clark Inc(pty:dft) (Lynn, Albert) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to R & GC Restoration LP ; served on 9/6/2023. (kaf) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to R & G Clark Inc; served on 9/2/2023. (kaf) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to R & G Clark Incorporated; served on 9/2/2023. (kaf) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Richard Rivas; served on 9/1/2023. (cfk) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth Ann Parrish on behalf of Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Parrish, Elizabeth) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Local Rule 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel where counsel of record for a party does not reside in this district. Accordingly, no later than September 11, 2023, the plaintiff shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so will result in dismissal without prejudice of this case without further notice. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/25/2023) (chmb) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Delpha Johnson, R & GC Restoration LP, R & G Clark Inc, R & G Clark Incorporated, Richard Rivas. (oyh) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Thompson, Rhonda) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13983795) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Cover Sheet) (Thompson, Rhonda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.