Sherrick v. Public Storage et al
Larry Owen Sherrick |
Public Storage and Emily Hayhoe |
3:2023cv01956 |
August 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
A Joe Fish |
Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
Real Property: Rent Lease & Ejectment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Wed Oct 25 08:42:07 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT: The plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice under FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or follow court orders. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/24/2023) (axm) |
Filing 8 ORDER ACCEPTING #7 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (docket entry #4 ), is DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/24/2023) (axm) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Fri Sep 22 08:37:14 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 7 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the #4 Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form), filed 8/31/2023, should be DENIED, and the case should be dismissed for failure to prosecute or comply with court orders. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/21/2023) (mcrd) |
Filing 6 ORDER re: the plaintiff's #4 Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). The plaintiff shall pay the required $402.00 filing fee to the Clerk of the Court within FOURTEEN (14) days from the date of this order. If he fails to do so, denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be recommended, and this case will be subject to dismissal without prejudice as provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/5/2023) (mcrd) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Sep 5 12:49:27 CDT 2023 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Mon Sep 4 10:49:27 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Larry Owen Sherrick. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (axm) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Larry Owen Sherrick. (axm) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Emily Hayhoe, Public Storage filed by Larry Owen Sherrick. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (axm) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (axm) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.