Tyson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Regina Tyson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Case Number: 3:2023cv02090
Filed: September 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Referring Judge: Renee Harris Toliver
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #10 Plaintiff's first Motion for Extension of Time to Pay the Reduced Court Filing Fee. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 11/1/2023) (chmb)
November 1, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION to Extend Time topay the reduced court filing fee filed by Regina Tyson (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Service, #2 Copy of Court Order) (Konoski, Bryan)
October 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Notice of Option to Consent to Proceed Before the Magistrate Judge. If appropriate, party(ies) should return the signed consent form to the clerk. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 10/17/2023) (axm)
October 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Within 30 days of the date Defendant files an Answer and/or the administrative record, Plaintiff shall file a brief setting forth all errors which Plaintiff contends entitle him/her to relief. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 10/17/2023) (axm)
September 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Amended Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Tyson is ORDERED to pay a partial filing fee of $100, payable to the Clerk of the Court in four monthly installments of $25 each, on 11/1, and 12/1/2023, and 1/1 and 2/1/2024. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 9/29/2023) (sxf)
September 28, 2023 Filing 6 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Regina Tyson (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Konoski, Bryan) Modified on 9/28/2023 (chmb).
September 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Regina Tyson must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis on the AO 239 form, by October 13, 2023, that gives the value of her car and additional details about her current expenses and explains why she cannot pay the filing fee for this case.. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 10/13/2023. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 9/22/2023) (mcrd)
September 19, 2023 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (agc)
September 19, 2023 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Regina Tyson. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Konoski, Bryan)
September 19, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Regina Tyson (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Konoski, Bryan)
September 19, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Regina Tyson. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es) if the motion to proceed IFP is granted. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Complaint NEF sent to SSA OGC and to TXND USAO.) (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Konoski, Bryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tyson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Regina Tyson
Represented By: Bryan Matthew Konoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?