Radford v. Dayton et al
| Jonathan Deon Radford |
| S Dayton, Deputy Sheriff and Tommy Kemp |
| 3:2023cv02144 |
| September 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 (AMENDED) COMPLAINT against S Dayton filed by Jonathan Deon Radford. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kaf) |
Filing 8
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Jonathan Deon Radford must address the following deficiency: Complaint is not in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 10/30/2023. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 9/28/2023) (Attachments: #1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, #2 Complaint Form) (cfk)
|
|
Filing 7
FILING FEE ORDER granting #4 , #5 Motions for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 9/28/2023) (axm) Modified text on 9/28/2023 (axm).
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. and Inmate Trust Fund Deparment Thu Sep 28 11:32:48 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Thu Sep 28 12:26:21 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Wed Sep 27 12:21:02 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 9 Unsworn Declaration by Jonathan Deon Radford. (axm) |
| Filing 6 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #3 Complaint, by Plaintiff Jonathan Deon Radford. (agc) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Jonathan Deon Radford. (agc) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jonathan Deon Radford. (agc) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against S Dayton, Deputy Sheriff, Tommy Kemp filed by Jonathan Deon Radford. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (agc) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (agc) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (agc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
