Ebrahimi v. United States of America et al
| Shamim Ebrahimi |
| United States of America, President Joseph R Biden, Merrick Garland, Director Alejandro Mayorkas, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice and United States of America et al |
| 3:2023cv02229 |
| September 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Other Statutes: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that the plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/9/2023) (cfk)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER ACCEPTING #14 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The plaintiff's Motion for an Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order & A Preliminary Injunction (docket entry 3 ) is DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/9/2023) (cfk)
|
|
Filing 14
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the plaintiff's 3 Motion for an Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order & A Preliminary Injunction should be DENIED, his case should be DISMISSED as frivolous, and he should be given a sanctions warning. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/16/2023) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 13 Draft Affidavit in Support of Legal Brief re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Shamim Ebrahimi. (Ebrahimi, Shamim) Docket text modified on 10/13/2023 (twd). |
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #10 Plaintiff's Motion for Certain Defendants' Identification Records for Service of Process. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/12/2023) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting the #2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/12/2023) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION FOR CERTAIN DEFENDANTS IDENTIFICATION RECORDS FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS filed by Shamim Ebrahimi (Ebrahimi, Shamim) Modified docket text on 10/12/2023 (kaf). |
| Filing 9 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez. (oyh) |
|
Filing 8
Order transferring case to the Dallas Division of the Northern District of Texas. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/6/2023) (krr)
|
| NEW CASE NUMBER 3:23-cv-02229-G Ebrahimi v. United States of America et al has been opened following the order of transfer entered in case number 5:23-cv-00230-H-BQ. Future filings should reflect only the new case number and be directed to the proper division (see LR 5.1(a)). Clerk to complete new case processing and mail notice of this entry to any party who did not receive it electronically. (mms) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The Court refers this case to the Honorable Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant for pretrial management pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). All dispositive motions or any other motions that Judge Bryant cannot resolve are referred to Judge Bryant for a hearing, if necessary, and a report and recommendation. All nondispositive matters, including procedural matters and discovery disputes, are referred to Judge Bryant for resolution. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 9/29/2023) (bmh)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Shamim Ebrahimi. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Ebrahimi, Shamim) |
| Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate No magistrate judge assigned (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (krr) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons and Notice filed by Shamim Ebrahimi. (Ebrahimi, Shamim) |
| Filing 2 Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shamim Ebrahimi (Ebrahimi, Shamim) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Shamim Ebrahimi. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es) for federal defendant(s). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1 - List of Statutory Law Violations, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 2 - List of Duties and Representations) (Ebrahimi, Shamim) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
