Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. The Hanover Insurance Company
Utica Mutual Insurance Company |
The Hanover Insurance Company |
3:2023cv02306 |
October 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sidney A Fitzwater |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Utica Mutual Insurance Company. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Johnson, Mark) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by The Hanover Insurance Company. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Alkas, Peri) |
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 12/20/2023. Amended Pleadings due by 7/26/2024. Discovery due by 6/21/2024. Motions due by 8/16/2024. Status Report due by 6/21/2024. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 11/22/2023) (kaf) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Accordingly, no later than 14 days after this order is filed, defendant must comply with Rule 81.1(a)(3)(D) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 11/22/2023) (kaf) |
Filing 6 ORDER: No later than 14 days after this order is filed, plaintiff must comply with Rule 81.2, or must adopt another partys previously-filed certificate, so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 11/22/2023) (kaf) |
Filing 5 TRIAL SETTING ORDER: Trial set for two-week docket beginning 2/18/2025 before Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 11/22/2023) (kaf) |
Filing 4 Proposal for contents of scheduling and discovery order Joint Proposed Scheduling Order by The Hanover Insurance Company. (Alkas, Peri) |
Filing 3 ORDER: Proposed Scheduling Order due by 11/20/2023. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 10/23/2023) (cfk) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cfk) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by The Hanover Insurance Company. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-14115428). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement with Attachment, #3 Additional Page(s) Index of Matters Being Filed, #4 Exhibit(s) A, #5 Exhibit(s) B, #6 Exhibit(s) C, #7 Exhibit(s) D, #8 Exhibit(s) E, #9 Exhibit(s) F, #10 Exhibit(s) G) (Alkas, Peri) (Attachments 1 and 2 replaced to flatten pdfs on 10/20/2023) (cfk). Modified text on 10/20/2023 (cfk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.