Williams v. Landstar Ranger Inc et al
| Mr. Korey Williams and Korey Williams |
| Landstar Ranger, Inc., Mr. Corey Raphael Davis, Landstar Inway Inc and Corey Raphael Davis |
| 3:2023cv02311 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle ( |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Remand. The clerk of the court shall effect the remand in accordance with the usual procedure. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 11/20/2023) (chmb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/20/2023: #1 Additional Page(s) Remand Letter) (ndt).
|
| Filing 5 First MOTION to Remand filed by Corey Raphael Davis, Landstar Inway Inc (Cox, Clinton) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Clinton V Cox, IV on behalf of Corey Raphael Davis, Landstar Inway Inc. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Cox, Clinton) |
|
Filing 3
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Corey Raphael Davis, Landstar Inway Inc must address the following deficiency: Jurisdiction. By 11/7/2023, Defendants must file an amended or supplemental notice of removal that cures the jurisdictional deficiency identified. Failure to comply with this order will result in the sua sponte remand of this action to state court. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 10/24/2023) (chmb)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh) |
| CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Corey Raphael Davis, Landstar Inway Inc. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (see document #1 -13 for image) (oyh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Landstar Ranger, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-14116437) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Index of Documents Filed in State Court, #2 Exhibit(s) A-1 - State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) A-2 - Plaintiff's Original Petition, #4 Exhibit(s) A-3 - Issuance of Citation - Landstar, #5 Exhibit(s) A- 4 - Issuance of Citation - Corey Davis, #6 Exhibit(s) A - 5 - Landstar's Original Answer, #7 Exhibit(s) B - Service to Landstar, #8 Exhibit(s) C - Service to Davis, #9 Exhibit(s) D - Plaintiff's Demand Letter, #10 Cover Sheet Civil, #11 Cover Sheet Supplement Civil, #12 Declaration(s) List of Counsel of Records, #13 Declaration(s) Certificate of Interested Persons / Disclosure Statement) (Cox, Clinton) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
