Wilson v. USA
Petitioner: Marcus Eugene Wilson
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 3:2023cv02339
Filed: October 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Karen Gren Scholer
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Marcus Eugene Wilson. (cfk)
October 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Court ORDERS that, by 12/26/2023, Movant shall either withdraw his 2255 motion or amend it using the enclosed form so that it contains all the claims he wishes to raise with respect to his federal conviction and/or sentence. The Court INSTRUCTS the District Clerk to send Movant two copies of the standard form for filing a motion to vacate, set-aside, or correct sentence. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 10/26/2023) (Attachments: #1 2255 Form, #2 2255 Form) (cfk) (Attachments 1 and 2 replaced to upload correct document on 10/26/2023) (cfk).
October 26, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Oct 26 16:33:40 CDT 2023 (crt)
October 23, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,3. Mon Oct 23 13:14:13 CDT 2023 (crt)
October 21, 2023 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (axm)
October 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER: The Court construes the Motion for Correction of Clerical Error Pursuant to Fed. Crim. P. 36 as one filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255, and a new case will be opened. The Court ORDERS the District Clerk to open a new habeas action under 2255 (nature of suit 510) and to file a copy of Defendant's Motion [ECF No. 191] in the new case. The new case is to be assigned to the undersigned District Judge and Magistrate Judge Rutherford. Finally, the District Clerk is to file all future pleadings related to the habeas matter in that new case. (Originally filed as document #192 in case 3:18-CR-585-S) (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 10/21/2023) (axm)
October 21, 2023 New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (axm)
October 13, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 3:18-CR-585-S) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Originally filed as document #191 in case 3:18-CR-585-S) (axm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Marcus Eugene Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?