Bernard v. Carter et al
| Odis Bernard |
| Darin Carter and City Square of Dallas |
| 3:2023cv02401 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David L Horan |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Torts/Pers Prop: Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8, 9. Wed Nov 29 10:00:28 CST 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 9
JUDGMENT - This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the issues having been duly considered and a decision duly rendered, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that all claims arising under federal law are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any remaining state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, to allow Plaintiff to pursue those claims in a state forum if he so chooses. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 11/28/2023) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re #7 Findings and Recommendations on Case. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 11/28/2023) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 7
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Unless Plaintiff Odis Bernard satisfactorily shows through timely objections a basis to amend the complaint to allege a plausible claim, the Court should dismiss all claims arising under federal law with prejudice and relinquish jurisdiction over any remaining state law claims, dismissing those claims without prejudice, to allow Bernard to pursue those claims in a state forum if he so chooses. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 11/2/2023) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING #5 LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. But service of process shall not issue, if at all, until the Court completes its screening of this action under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 11/2/2023) (mcrd)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 6, 7. Thu Nov 2 17:24:04 CDT 2023 (crt)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Tue Oct 31 12:57:29 CDT 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Odis Bernard. (oyh)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Odis Bernard. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (oyh)
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT against Darin Carter, City Square of Dallas filed by Odis Bernard. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (oyh)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (oyh)
|
|
Filing 1
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
