Radford v. Texas Board of Pardon and Parole
Petitioner: Jonathan Deon Radford
Respondent: Texas Board of Pardon and Parole
Case Number: 3:2023cv02427
Filed: October 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David L Horan
Referring Judge: Ed Kinkeade
2 Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Special Order 3-351: Effective December 7, 2023, active cases assigned or referred to Magistrate Judge Irma C. Ramirez will be transferred to the dockets of other magistrate judges in the Dallas Division as outlined on Exhibit A to this order. This case has been reassigned pursuant to Special Order No. 3-351. (The clerk has mailed a copy to all non-ECF users.) (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 12/7/2023) (twd)
December 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, this habeas case should be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute or follow court orders. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 12/7/2023) (mcrd)
December 7, 2023 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Thu Dec 7 08:23:42 CST 2023 (crt)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Mail returned as undeliverable. #1 Judge Kinkeade, #2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party received back from Jonathan Deon Radford as Not in Dallas County Jail. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (kcr)
November 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Mail returned as undeliverable. #5 Order And Notice of Deficiency,,, received back from Jonathan Dean Radford as vacant; unable to forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (kcr)
November 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Jonathan Deon Radford must address the following deficiency: He must either pay the $5 filing fee for a habeas case or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Courts may only consider federal habeas petitions on grounds that the petitioner is in custody in violation of the Constitution or federal laws. Any type of non-habeas civil claims, including claims of negligence, fraud, slander and defamation, must be raised in a separate civil action.The petitioner may only raise habeas claims in a habeas petition, and this case will onlyproceed as a 2254 habeas case. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 11/6/2023) (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion, #2 2254, #3 1983 Form, #4 IFP Motion) (agc)
November 6, 2023 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Mon Nov 6 12:35:00 CST 2023 (crt)
November 3, 2023 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri Nov 3 09:51:51 CDT 2023 (crt)
October 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jonathan Deon Radford. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ndt)
October 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ndt)
October 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt)
October 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jonathan Deon Radford. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (axm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Radford v. Texas Board of Pardon and Parole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jonathan Deon Radford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Texas Board of Pardon and Parole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?