Higgins v. Rivers
| Joshua N Higgins |
| C Rivers |
| 3:2023cv02436 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Request for a Delay for Payment filed by Joshua N Higgins. (agc) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Dec 12 10:41:44 CST 2023 (crt) |
Filing 5
Special Order 3-351: Effective December 7, 2023, active cases assigned or referred to Magistrate Judge Irma C. Ramirez will be transferred to the dockets of other magistrate judges in the Dallas Division as outlined on Exhibit A to this order. This case has been reassigned pursuant to Special Order No. 3-351. (The clerk has mailed a copy to all non-ECF users.) (Ordered by Chief Judge David C. Godbey on 12/7/2023) (mms)
|
|
Filing 4
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Joshua N Higgins must address the following deficiency: $5 filing fee. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 11/6/2023) (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion) (agc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Mon Nov 6 09:38:49 CST 2023 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Fri Nov 3 10:38:27 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sxf) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sxf) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joshua N Higgins. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sxf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Higgins v. Rivers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Joshua N Higgins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: C Rivers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
