Katz v. ATX Innovation Inc
Plaintiff: Melissa Katz
Defendant: ATX Innovation, Inc. and ATX Innovation Inc doing business as DBA Union doing business as TabbedOut
Case Number: 3:2023cv02685
Filed: December 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Brantley Starr
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ELECTRONIC ORDER: The Court GRANTS the parties' joint motion to stay pending arbitration (Doc. 11) and FINDS AS MOOT ATX Innovation Inc.'s motion for extension of time to file an answer, (Doc. 10). This case is STAYED pending arbitration. The parties are INSTRUCTED to file a motion to lift the stay once arbitration is complete. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 1/24/2024) (chmb)
January 24, 2024 Case Stayed, #11 Joint MOTION to Stay, #10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer terminated Per 12 Order. (agc)
January 22, 2024 Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Stay Judicial Proceedings Pending Arbitration filed by ATX Innovation Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - TCA, #2 Exhibit(s) 2 - Acceptance) (Sedge, Brent)
January 18, 2024 Filing 10 Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by ATX Innovation Inc. (Sedge, Brent) Modified text on 1/19/2024 (cfk).
January 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #7 Motion to Extend Time. Defendant ATX Innovation, Inc.'s deadline to file a responsive pleading is now January 19, 2024. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 1/3/2024) (chmb)
December 27, 2023 Filing 8 Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Sedge, Brent)
December 27, 2023 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time to file Initial Responsive Pleading filed by ATX Innovation Inc (Sedge, Brent)
December 7, 2023 Filing 6 Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Hartmann, Clay)
December 7, 2023 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to ATX Innovation Inc. (kcr)
December 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Electronic Standing Order - If they have not already done so, all attorneys appearing in this case must file a Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements on the docket attesting that they have read, and will comply with, the judge-specific requirements for this Court, including the Court's order concerning generative artificial intelligence. The judge-specific requirements and a template Certificate may be found at: # Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. To file the Certificate, please use the event entitled Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. This event is located in the Other Documents selection, which is under the Other Filings category of the Civil page in ECF. Please contact the ECF help desk at 214-753-2633 for filing assistance. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 12/6/2023) (kcr)
December 6, 2023 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr)
December 6, 2023 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Melissa Katz. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Hartmann, Clay)
December 6, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against ATX Innovation, Inc. filed by Melissa Katz. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-14222269) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Hartmann, Clay)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Katz v. ATX Innovation Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Katz
Represented By: Clay A Hartmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ATX Innovation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ATX Innovation Inc doing business as DBA Union doing business as TabbedOut
Represented By: Brent Douglas Sedge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?