Mendez v. Berkshire Property Advisors LLC et al
| Juan Mendez |
| Berkshire Property Advisors, LLC d/b/a Berkshire Residential Investments, BMEF Stoneleigh Limited Partnership, Berkshire Property Advisors LLC doing business as Berkshire Residential Investments and Berkshire Communities LLC |
| 3:2023cv02716 |
| December 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's First AMENDED COMPLAINT against BMEF Stoneleigh Limited Partnership, Berkshire Property Advisors LLC, Berkshire Communities LLC filed by Juan Mendez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ykp) |
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #4 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. (Unless the document has already been filed, clerk to enter Document 4-1 as of the date of this order.) (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 1/29/2024) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Juan Mendez re #5 MOTION Determine Applicability of Sec. 18.001 TCP&RC (Avant, Anjel) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Determine Applicability of Sec. 18.001 TCP&RC filed by Juan Mendez (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Avant, Anjel) Modified text on 1/24/2024 (cfk). |
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by Juan Mendez with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Proposed Order). Party Berkshire Communities, LLC added. (Avant, Anjel) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by BMEF Stoneleigh Limited Partnership. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Paret, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (agc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by BMEF Stoneleigh Limited Partnership. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-14231737) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s), #7 Exhibit(s), #8 Cover Sheet, #9 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Paret, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
