United States of America v. Real Property Known as 3300 State Highway 78, Garland, TX et al
United States of America |
Real Property Known as 3300 State Highway 78, Garland, TX, Real Property Known as 2806 W. FM 544, Wylie TX, Real Property Known as 9229 Lebanon Rd, Frisco, TX, Real Property Known as 3833 Honeysuckle Lane, Elgin IL, Real Property Known as 210 N. Tennessee St, Mckinney TX, Real Property Known as 608 S. Saginaw Blvd, Saginaw TX, Real Property Known as 9981 Slater Creek Rd, Anna TX, Real Property Known as 35075 Beach Rd, Dana Point CA, Real Property Known as 5528 Palisades Dr, Plano TX, Real Property Known as 1309 Bradshaw Dr, Plano TX, Real Property Known as PID 2645906 State Highway 121, Allen TX, Real Property Known as 1220 Park Vista Rd, Plano TX, Real Property Known as PID 2645908 State Highway 121, Allen TX and Real Property Known as 520 N. Preston Rd, Celina TX |
City of McKinney |
3:2023cv02784 |
December 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Brantley Starr |
Forfeiture/Penalty: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 USA Plaintiff |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #13 Motion to Stay. This case is stayed for 60 days. In 60 days, the United States and City of McKinney are ORDERED to file a joint status report updating the Court of the status of the yet-to-be-filed joint motion to stay this civil forfeiture proceeding pending the ongoing criminal investigation. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 2/14/2024) (ndt) |
Filing 13 Joint MOTION to Stay Claimant City of McKinney's Answer to United States' Complaint filed by United States of America with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rocha-DOJ, Dimitri) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Publication filed by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Advertisement Certification Report) (Rocha-DOJ, Dimitri) |
Filing 11 Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Voss, Edwin) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Real Property Known as 210 N. Tennessee St, Mckinney TX. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Voss, Edwin) |
Filing 9 Claim of Interest by Tenant City of McKinney, Texas, in Claim by Real Property Known as 210 N. Tennessee St, Mckinney TX. (Voss, Edwin) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Recording of Lis Pendens for Defendant Property filed by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - Lis Pendens) (Rocha-DOJ, Dimitri) |
Filing 7 Court Request for Recusal: Magistrate Judge David L. Horan recused pursuant to Special Order 3-346. Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford assigned for matters that may be referred in this case. (ndt) |
Filing 6 Electronic Standing Order - If they have not already done so, all attorneys appearing in this case must file a Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements on the docket attesting that they have read, and will comply with, the judge-specific requirements for this Court, including the Court's order concerning generative artificial intelligence. The judge-specific requirements and a template Certificate may be found at: # Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. To file the Certificate, please use the event entitled Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. This event is located in the Other Documents selection, which is under the Other Filings category of the Civil page in ECF. Please contact the ECF help desk at 214-753-2633 for filing assistance. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 12/20/2023) (kcr) |
Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) |
Filing 4 Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Rocha-DOJ, Dimitri) |
Filing 3 Supplemental CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by United States of America. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Rocha-DOJ, Dimitri) (Main Document 3 flattened on 12/20/2023) (kcr). Modified event text on 12/20/2023 (kcr). |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by United States of America. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Rocha-DOJ, Dimitri) (Main Document 2 flattened on 12/20/2023) (kcr). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by United States of America. (Filer fee note- Filed by the USA) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - Declaration in Support of Civil Forfeiture Complaint, #2 Cover Sheet) (Rocha-DOJ, Dimitri) (Attachment 2 flattened on 12/20/2023) (kcr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.