Tanner v. Navy Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff: Linda Diane Tanner
Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union
Case Number: 3:2024cv00069
Filed: January 9, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jane J Boyle
Referring Judge: David L Horan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re: #6 Motion to Reopen Case. The filing should not be considered in Dallas, as this lawsuit has been transferred to Fort Worth. The Court therefore DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to RE-FILE Tanner's motion in Civil Action No. 4:24-cv-39-Y. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 1/24/2024) (sxf)
January 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 First MOTION to Reopen Case filed by Linda Diane Tanner with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Tanner, Linda)
January 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: The Court will immediately transfer this action to the Fort Worth Division of the Northern District of Texas under Section 1391(b)(2) and the undersigned's authority granted by Rule 2(a)(3) of the Courts Miscellaneous Order No. 6 (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 1/10/2024) (axm)
January 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Case copied to 4:24cv0039-Y. Transfer to Fort Worth Division complete; clerk to set Related Case hyperlink, clear unnecessary flags, etc. (ldm)
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Linda Diane Tanner. (kcr)
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Navy Federal Credit Union filed by Linda Diane Tanner. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kcr)
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kcr)
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tanner v. Navy Federal Credit Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda Diane Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?