Binswo Partners Ltd v. The Sherwin Williams Company
Binswo Partners Ltd |
The Sherwin Williams Company |
3:2024cv00117 |
January 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Ed Kinkeade |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: Member case(s) 3:23-cv-02620 consolidated with lead case 3:24-CV-00117. The Sherwin Williams Company and Binswo Partners Ltd added to case pursuant to consolidation. Attorney Catherine B Baldo, Kartik R Singapura for The Sherwin Williams Company; Jeffrey H Rasansky, Sara Hollan Chelette, Eric W Pinker, Braden Lee Dotson for Binswo Partners Ltd added to case pursuant to consolidation. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 2/23/2024) (agc) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sara Hollan Chelette for Braden Dotson on behalf of Binswo Partners Ltd. (Chelette, Sara) |
Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Binswo Partners Ltd (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Sara Hollan Chelette added to party Binswo Partners Ltd(pty:pla) (Chelette, Sara) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Binswo Partners Ltd. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Chelette, Sara) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Catherine B Baldo on behalf of The Sherwin Williams Company. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Baldo, Catherine) |
Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Ed Kinkeade for possible consolidation with Civil Action No. 3:23-CV-2620-K. Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater no longer assigned to case. All future pleadings shall be filed under Civil Action No. 3:24-CV-0117-K. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 1/17/2024) (cea) |
Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by The Sherwin Williams Company (Singapura, Kartik) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of [Civil Cover Sheet] re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by The Sherwin Williams Company (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Singapura, Kartik) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by The Sherwin Williams Company. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Singapura, Kartik) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by The Sherwin Williams Company. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-14315894) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D) (Singapura, Kartik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.