Srinivasaiah et al v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Plaintiff: Shri Kiran Srinivasaiah and Apeksha
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Ur Jaddou and US Citizenship and Immigration Services
Case Number: 3:2024cv00126
Filed: January 17, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2024 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Apeksha, Shri Kiran Srinivasaiah re #3 Cert. Of Interested Persons/Disclosure Statement, #5 Judge Lindsay, 7 Order on Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice, (Rosen, Adam)
January 31, 2024 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney (Ur Jaddou), served on 1/30/2024; U.S. Attorney (US Citizenship and Immigration Services), served on 1/31/2024; U.S. Attorney General (Ur Jaddou), served on 1/29/2024; U.S. Attorney General (US Citizenship and Immigratin Services); served on 1/29/2024; Ur Jaddou; served on 1/30/2024; US Citizenship and Immigration Services; served on 1/31/2024. (Rosen, Adam) Modified text on 2/4/2024 (axm).
January 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #4 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Adam J. Rosen. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 1/18/2024) (chmb)
January 17, 2024 Filing 6 Summons issued as to Ur Jaddou, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (kcr)
January 17, 2024 Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr)
January 17, 2024 Filing 4 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-14318315) filed by Apeksha, Shri Kiran Srinivasaiah (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Rosen, Adam)
January 17, 2024 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Apeksha, Shri Kiran Srinivasaiah. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Rosen, Adam)
January 17, 2024 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summonses to USCIS, USCIS Director Ur Jaddou, US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Civil Process Clerk for US Attorney filed by Apeksha, Shri Kiran Srinivasaiah. (Rosen, Adam)
January 17, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services filed by Shri Kiran Srinivasaiah, Apeksha. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-14318218) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Table and Exhibits A to D, #2 Cover Sheet) (Rosen, Adam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Srinivasaiah et al v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shri Kiran Srinivasaiah
Represented By: Adam Joseph Rosen
Represented By: Amy M Hsu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Apeksha
Represented By: Adam Joseph Rosen
Represented By: Amy M Hsu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Citizenship and Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?