Savancys Inc v. Trendset IT Inc et al
Savancys Inc. and Savancys Inc |
Trendset IT Inc., Bhrigus Inc., Computek Solutions Inc., Trendset IT Inc, Bhrigus Inc and Computek Solutions Inc |
3:2024cv00139 |
January 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Karen Gren Scholer |
Labor: Other Labor Litigation |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Bhrigus Inc, Computek Solutions Inc, Trendset IT Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Smith, Brantley) |
|
Filing 13 Joint MOTION to Continue Rule 16 Initial Hearing filed by Bhrigus Inc, Computek Solutions Inc, Trendset IT Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Motion for Continuance) (Smith, Brantley) |
|
|
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Savancys Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Gargano, Brian) |
|
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Savancys Inc. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Gargano, Brian) |
Filing 7 MOTION MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED WITHOUT DESIGNATING LOCAL COUNSEL WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE COURTHOUSE filed by Savancys Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Gargano, Brian) |
Filing 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Bhrigus Inc, Computek Solutions Inc, Trendset IT Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Smith, Brantley) |
Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Consent to Removal filed by Trendset IT Inc. (Slovak, Robert) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Consent to Removal filed by Computek Solutions Inc. (Slovak, Robert) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bhrigus Inc., Computek Solutions Inc., Trendset IT Inc.. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Slovak, Robert) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Bhrigus Inc.. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-14323035) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) B - Supplemental Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) C - State Court Docket, #4 Exhibit(s) D - Index to State Court Pleadings) (Slovak, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.