Martin v. Unknown et al
| Jarrod Martin |
| Officer Unknown Unknown |
| 3:2024cv00167 |
| January 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David L Horan |
| Brantley Starr |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Amend #1 Complaint filed by Jarrod Martin (See doc #11 for Image) (ykp) |
| Filing 11 OBJECTION to #10 Findings and Recommendations by Jarrod Martin (ykp) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. and mailed to the inmate trust fund Mon Feb 12 09:02:45 CST 2024 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Mon Feb 12 09:02:53 CST 2024 (crt) |
Filing 10
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - The Court should therefore dismiss Martin's claims. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 2/9/2024) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 9
PLRA FILING FEE ORDER: Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Plaintiff shall pay $350.00, the balance of the filing fee, in monthly installments as provided in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). After payment of the initial partial filing fee, if any, the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall deduct 20% of each deposit made to Plaintiffs inmate trust account and forward payments to the Court on a regular basis provided the account exceeds $10.00. Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 2/9/2024) (chmb) Modified on 2/12/2024 (mcrd).
|
|
Filing 8
Electronic Standing Order - If they have not already done so, all attorneys appearing in this case must file a Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements on the docket attesting that they have read, and will comply with, the judge-specific requirements for this Court, including the Court's order concerning generative artificial intelligence. The judge-specific requirements and a template Certificate may be found at: # Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. To file the Certificate, please use the event entitled Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. This event is located in the Other Documents selection, which is under the Other Filings category of the Civil page in ECF. Please contact the ECF help desk at 214-753-2633 for filing assistance. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 1/23/2024) (kcr)
|
| Filing 5 Case electronically transferred in from District of Texas Eastern; Case Number 6:24-cv-00018. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7. Tue Jan 23 10:14:22 CST 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 7 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kcr) |
| Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF TRANSFER. This case is TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. The Clerk of Court shall transfer the case forthwith and without delay. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 1/22/2024. (wea, 6) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 1/23/2024.]
|
| Interdistrict transfer to the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. (wea, 6) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 1/23/2024.] |
| Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (wea, 6) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 1/23/2024.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jarrod Martin. (wea, 6) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 1/23/2024.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jarrod Martin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wea, 6) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 1/23/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin v. Unknown et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jarrod Martin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Officer Unknown Unknown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
