Ramirez Perea v. Blinken et al
| Ana Paula Ramirez Perea |
| Antony J Blinken, Merrick B Garland, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Department of State, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, US Citizenship and Immigration Services and National Visa Center |
| 3:2024cv00391 |
| February 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to National Visa Center ; served on 3/15/2024. (Kuck, Charles) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Department of Homeland Security ; served on 3/18/2024. (Kuck, Charles) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Merrick B Garland ; served on 3/18/2024. (Kuck, Charles) |
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #5 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Charles H. Kuck. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 2/23/2024) (chmb)
|
| Filing 5 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Charles H. Kuck (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-14413137) filed by Ana Paula Ramirez Perea (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s), #2 Additional Page(s), #3 Proposed Order) (Huddleston, Brent) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to Antony J Blinken, Merrick B Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, National Visa Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of State, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (ykp) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ykp) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ana Paula Ramirez Perea. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Huddleston, Brent) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Ana Paula Ramirez Perea. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-14403839) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit(s) Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit(s) Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit(s) Exhibit E) (Huddleston, Brent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
