Harbus v. Nexstar Media Inc
| Richard Harbus |
| Nexstar Media Inc doing business as Nexstar Broadcasting Inc |
| 3:2024cv00476 |
| February 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Property Rights: Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth Aten Lamberson for Michael E. Coles on behalf of Richard Harbus. (Lamberson, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Nexstar Media Inc. (kcr) |
| Filing 5 Report to Copyright Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 121 e-mailed to 508filings@loc.gov. (kcr) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James H Freeman on behalf of Richard Harbus. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Freeman, James) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Richard Harbus. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Nexstar Media Inc. filed by Richard Harbus. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-14426252) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Original Photograph, #2 Exhibit(s) Infringing Use of Photograph, #3 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harbus v. Nexstar Media Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Harbus | |
| Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
| Represented By: | James H Freeman |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Aten Lamberson |
| Represented By: | Michael E Coles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nexstar Media Inc doing business as Nexstar Broadcasting Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
