Acy v. Family Dollars et al
James Antwone Acy |
Family Dollars, Darius Scott, Planet Fitness, Dallas Police Department, Desoto Police Department, Denison Police Department, Howe Police Department, Van Alystne Police Department, Bells Police Department, Terrell Police Department, Kaufman Police Department, Sherman Police Department, Mesquite Police Department, Dallas Sheriffs Department, Desoto Sheriffs Department, Denison Sheriffs Department, Howe Sheriffs Department, Van Alystne Sheriffs Department, Bells Sheriffs Department, Terrell Sheriffs Department, Kaufman Sheriffs Department, Sherman Sheriffs Department, Dallas Magistrate, Desoto Magistrate, Mesquite Magistrate, Kaufman Magistrate, Terrell Magistrate, Sherman Magistrate, Howe Magistrate, Bells Magistrate, Van Alystne Magistrate, Denison Magistrate, Dallas Attorney, Desoto Attorney, Mesquite Attorney, Kaufman Attorney, Terrell Attorney, Sherman Attorney, Howe Attorney, Bells Attorney, Van Alystne Attorney, Denison Attorney and Texas Department of Public Safety |
3:2024cv00589 |
March 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sidney A Fitzwater |
David L Horan |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Mon Mar 11 11:48:58 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James Antwone Acy. (kcr) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Bells Attorney, Bells Magistrate, Bells Police Department, Bells Sheriffs Department, Dallas Attorney, Dallas Magistrate, Dallas Police Department, Dallas Sheriffs Department, Denison Attorney, Denison Magistrate, Denison Police Department, Denison Sheriffs Department, Desoto Attorney, Desoto Magistrate, Desoto Police Department, Desoto Sheriffs Department, Family Dollars, Howe Attorney, Howe Magistrate, Howe Police Department, Howe Sheriffs Department, Kaufman Attorney, Kaufman Magistrate, Kaufman Police Department, Kaufman Sheriffs Department, Mesquite Attorney, Mesquite Magistrate, Mesquite Police Department, Planet Fitness, Darius Scott, Sherman Attorney, Sherman Magistrate, Sherman Police Department, Sherman Sheriffs Department, Terrell Attorney, Terrell Magistrate, Terrell Police Department, Terrell Sheriffs Department, Texas Department of Public Safety, Van Alystne Attorney, Van Alystne Magistrate, Van Alystne Police Department, Van Alystne Sheriffs Department filed by James Antwone Acy. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kcr) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kcr) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.