Khan et al v. Blinken et al
| Mohammad Daud Khan and Sundal Aziz |
| Antony J Blinken, Rena Bitter, Alejandro Mayorkas, Jayne A Howell and John Does 1-10 |
| 3:2024cv00810 |
| April 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons as to all federal defendants filed by Sundal Aziz, Mohammad Daud Khan. (Nimer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sundal Aziz, Mohammad Daud Khan. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Nimer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by Mohammad Daud Khan, Sundal Aziz. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-14513197) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Cover Sheet) (Nimer, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
