Allen-Straight v. The State of Texas et al
Case Number: 3:2024cv00982
Filed: April 22, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Petitioner pursued a writ of error coram nobis in this closed action instead of complying with the Courts order in the event she desired to pursue a habeas corpus action under § 2254 or a civil rights action under & #167; 1983. Because she now appears to seek habeas relief in this closed action, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to: (1) sever Petitioners [W]rit of habeus [sic] corpus petition (in equity in chancery) and related exhibits (doc. 27 at 8-77) from this closed action; (2) open a new habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254; (3) directly assign the new § 2254 case to the same District Judge and Magistrate Judge as in this closed case; and (4) docket a copy of the severed filing and this order in that new case. Any appropriate warnings and orders will be issued in the newly opened case. Originally filed in case 3:23-cv-1087 as document 29. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 4/22/2024) (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 4/22/2024) (agc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen-Straight v. The State of Texas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?