Sanchez-Gonzalez v. USA
| Fernando Sanchez-Gonzalez |
| USA |
| 3:2024cv01121 |
| May 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
(Document Restricted) Sealed Order dismissing 628 Motion to Reduce Sentence re: FIRST STEP Act without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is INSTRUCTED to: (1) terminate the motion in this criminal case; (2) open for statistical purposes a new habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. 2241; (3) directly assign the new 2241 action to the same District Judge and Magistrate Judge as in this criminal case; (4) docket a copy of the motion and this order in the new case; and (5) close the new case on the basis of this order. The Clerk of Court is also INSTRUCTED to transmit to Defendant a copy of this order and a copy of the Court's standard form for a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 only at the address provided by Defendant for his partner in the United States. (Originally filed in 3:11-CR-00154 #629) (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 5/10/2024) (Attachments: #1 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus) (ykp)
|
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Fernando Sanchez-Gonzalez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Originally filed in 3:11-CR-00154 #628) (ykp) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (ykp) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ykp) |
| Civil Case Terminated per #4 Order. (ykp) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri May 10 11:53:12 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sanchez-Gonzalez v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Fernando Sanchez-Gonzalez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
