Sanchez-Wright et al v. Caterpillar Inc et al
Plaintiff: Victoria Sanchez-Wright and Dominque Wright
Defendant: Vulcan Materials Company and Caterpillar Inc
Case Number: 3:2024cv01185
Filed: May 16, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2024 Filing 19 Appendix in Support filed by Caterpillar Inc re #18 Response/Objection to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Howell, Brad)
July 8, 2024 Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Caterpillar Inc re: #13 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Howell, Brad)
June 28, 2024 Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Vulcan Materials Company. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Herring, John)
June 17, 2024 Filing 16 NOTICE of Consent to Removal filed by Vulcan Materials Company (Herring, John)
June 17, 2024 Filing 15 Appendix in Support filed by Victoria Sanchez-Wright, Dominque Wright re #13 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Samples, Steven)
June 17, 2024 Filing 14 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Victoria Sanchez-Wright, Dominque Wright re #13 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Samples, Steven)
June 17, 2024 Filing 13 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Victoria Sanchez-Wright, Dominque Wright (Samples, Steven)
June 17, 2024 Filing 12 (Document Restricted) Attorney Contact Information (Sealed pursuant to SO 19-1, statute, or rule) filed by Victoria Sanchez-Wright, Dominque Wright (Samples, Steven)
June 17, 2024 Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Steven Robert Samples on behalf of Victoria Sanchez-Wright, Dominque Wright. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Samples, Steven)
June 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Before the Court is Defendant Vulcan Materials Company's Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Original Petition (the "Motion") (Doc. No. 9). Having carefully considered the Motion, the Court finds good cause exists for the requested extension of time. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Defendant Vulcan Materials Company shall file its answer or otherwise respond by June 28, 2024. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 6/10/2024) (chmb)
June 7, 2024 Filing 9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Original Petition filed by Vulcan Materials Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney John R Herring added to party Vulcan Materials Company(pty:dft) (Herring, John)
June 7, 2024 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Caterpillar Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Howell, Brad)
May 17, 2024 Filing 7 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Caterpillar Inc. Amended Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s)) (Kratovil, Christopher)
May 17, 2024 Filing 6 Court Request for Recusal: Magistrate Judge David L. Horan recused pursuant to Special Order 3-346. Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver assigned for matters that may be referred in this case. (mms)
May 17, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Defendant Caterpillar Inc. ("Caterpillar") removed this case to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. 1332(a). Doc. No. 1 at 2. Accordingly, the parties' citizenship must be completely diverse in that one of the plaintiffs cannot share the same state citizenship as one of the defendants. See Corfield v. Dallas Glen Hills LP, 355 F.3d 853, 857 (5th Cir. 2003). "When jurisdiction depends on citizenship, citizenship must be 'distinctly and affirmatively alleged.'" Getty Oil Corp., a Div. of Texaco v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 841 F.2d 1254, 1259 (5th Cir. 1988). Caterpillar alleges that "Plaintiff Victoria Sanchez-Wright is an individual citizen of Norman, Oklahoma." Doc. No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff Victoria Sanchez-Wright is suing not only in her individual capacity but as the representative of the Estate of Kenneth William Wright, deceased. For diversity purposes, "the legal representative of the estate of a decedent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the decedent[.]" 28 U.S.C. 1332(c)(2). Although it properly alleges Plaintiff Victoria Sanchez-Wright's citizenship in her individual capacity, Caterpillar does not properly allege her citizenship as the legal representative of the Estate of Kenneth William Wright. Thus, at this time, the Court cannot determine whether the parties are completely diverse in their citizenship.The Court also notes that Caterpillar fails to indicate in its Notice of Removal whether or not Defendant Vulcan Materials Company has been "properly served and joined" for purposes of 1446(b)(2).The Court has "an independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party." Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006) (citing Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574, 583 (1999)). The party seeking the federal forum bears the burden of establishing subject matter jurisdiction. See St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Greenburg, 134 F.3d 1250, 1253 (5th Cir. 1998). Caterpillar may amend it Notice of Removal in accordance with this Order by May 24, 2024. If Caterpillar fails to amend or fails to do so sufficiently, the Court will remand this case without further notice. 28 U.S.C. 1447(c) (in action removed from state court, federal court must remand case any time before final judgment if court determines it lacks subject matter jurisdiction); see Stockman v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 138 F.3d 144, 151 (5th Cir. 1998) (federal court has no power to adjudicate claims where subject matter jurisdiction does not exist). (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 5/17/2024) (chmb)
May 16, 2024 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr)
May 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: This Order governs requests to file materials in this case under seal. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 5/16/2024) (chmb)
May 16, 2024 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Caterpillar Inc.. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Kratovil, Christopher)
May 16, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Caterpillar Inc.. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-14625655) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s)) (Kratovil, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanchez-Wright et al v. Caterpillar Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vulcan Materials Company
Represented By: Troy L Vancil
Represented By: John R Herring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caterpillar Inc
Represented By: Clay Cosse
Represented By: Brad Howell
Represented By: Alexandria Marie Twiss
Represented By: Christopher D Kratovil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Victoria Sanchez-Wright
Represented By: Steven Robert Samples
Represented By: Coby L Wooten
Represented By: Andrew Scott Bullard
Represented By: James Lee Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dominque Wright
Represented By: Steven Robert Samples
Represented By: Coby L Wooten
Represented By: Andrew Scott Bullard
Represented By: James Lee Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?