Sutherland v. USA
| Joshua Sutherland |
| USA |
| 3:2024cv01219 |
| May 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that the action under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 6/18/2024) (cfk)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Court DISMISSES this habeas action for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk of the Court is INSTRUCTED to transmit to Movant a copy of the AO 243 standard form for cases filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 in the event he wishes to file a Section 2255motion (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 6/18/2024) (Attachments: #1 2255 Form) (cfk)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Tue Jun 18 11:58:14 CDT 2024 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2. Wed May 29 10:20:41 CDT 2024 (crt) |
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC STANDING ORDER: Counsel are required to review and comply with the Courts Judge Specific Requirements, which can be found at http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/judge/district-judge-karen-gren-scholer. The Court updates its Requirements periodically. Also, counsel are required to review and comply with the Northern District of Texass Local Civil Rules, which can be found at https://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/civil-rules. In particular, the Court directs counsel to review Rules 3.1, 7.4, and 81.2, regarding certificates of interested persons, and Rule 83.10, regarding local counsel. Counsel are expected to review the Requirements and Local Rules before contacting the Court with questions. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 5/28/2024) (axm)
|
| Filing 1 Motion for Extension of Time to File 2255 Motion filed by Joshua Sutherland. (agc) |
| New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (agc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sutherland v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Joshua Sutherland | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
