Green v. Telford Unit
| Lowell Dequincy Green |
| Telford Unit |
| 3:2024cv01974 |
| July 30, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David L Horan |
| Brantley Starr |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5, 6. Fri Sep 13 08:33:06 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Filing 6
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to pay the necessary filing fee. The Court prospectively CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Jorge A Solis on 9/12/2024) (cfk)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER ACCEPTING #4 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 9/12/2024) (cfk)
|
|
Filing 4
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should summarily dismiss this action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) unless, within the time for filing objections to this recommendation or by some other deadline established by the Court, Plaintiff Lowell Dequincy Green pays the full filing fee of $405. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 8/23/2024) (kaf)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Fri Aug 23 12:51:44 CDT 2024 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Thu Aug 1 11:27:34 CDT 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (kaf) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kaf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Telford Unit filed by Lowell Dequincy Green. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kaf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Green v. Telford Unit | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Telford Unit | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lowell Dequincy Green | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
